Comprehensive DescriptionRead full entry
Geographic distribution of T. (M.) eschmeyeri ZBK .
In his review of the Atlantic scorpionfishes, Eschmeyer (1969) reported that T. (M.) eschmeyeri ZBK (as T. (M.) capensis ) was distributed only off the southwestern tip of South Africa, based on previous literature reports related to Scorpaena capensis Gilchrist & von Bonde ZBK (= T. eschmeyeri ZBK ) and a single museum specimen (BMNH 19126.96.36.199, 320 mm SL). Subsequently, Parin et al. (1995) and Pakhorukov (2001) reported T. capensis (probably T. eschmeyeri ZBK ) from the Rio Grande Rise, southwestern Atlantic, on the basis of collected specimens and underwater visual observations respectively. In the Pacific Ocean, Paulin (1982) reported T. eschmeyeri ZBK (as T. capensis ) from 29 specimens (185-400 mm SL) from northern New Zealand. Eschmeyer (1986) suggested that the same or a similar species to T. capensis occurs off southern Australia, and Poss (1994) reported T. eschmeyeri ZBK (as T. capensis ) from deep continental slope waters of southern Australia (off Tasmania, Victoria and South Australia). In the Indian Ocean, Shcherbachev(1987) reported T. capensis from the West Australian Ridge and Madagascar Ridge, and Duhamel (1999) reported T. capensis from off the St Paul and Amsterdam Islands. Shcherbachev’s (1987) and Duhamel’s (1999) T. capensis possibly contain T. eschmeyeri ZBK and T. longipedicula . Specimens of T. eschmeyeri ZBK (CSIRO H 5799-01, H 3174-15, H 3174-16, and H 3174-17; see Materials and Methods) and T. longipedicula (all type specimens) examined in this study were collected from the South-West Indian and West Australian Ridges, and South-West Indian Ridge respectively; these are almost the same localities from which Shcherbachev’s (1987) specimens were collected. Williams et al. (1996) reported T. capensis and T. cf cristulata from Western Australia on the basis of CSIRO H 2625-02 and H 2616-01 respectively. Our examinations of both specimens showed that their T. capensis and T. cf cristulata were T. carnomagula and T. eschmeyeri ZBK . Judging from the previous reports and our specimens, we consider T. eschmeyeri ZBK to be widely distributed in the Southern Hemisphere, from the western Atlantic to the southwestern Pacific Ocean through the Indian Ocean, between ca. 30° and 45°S at depths of 400-1250 m.
Trachyscorpia carnomagula and T. longipedicula are allopatrically distributed in Australasia and the southwestern Indian Ocean respectively, but both species co-occur with T. eschmeyeri ZBK . Incidentally, T. cristulata (including subspecies) is distributed only in the Northern Hemisphere in the Atlantic Ocean.
Taxonomic problems of T. (T.) cristulata and T. (M.) eschmeyeri ZBK . Ginsburg (1953) recognized T. cristulata (western Atlantic Ocean) and T. echinata (eastern Atlantic) as valid species, but his data for T. echinata were based on a single specimen. Eschmeyer (1969) reviewed previous reports of cristulata and echinata , and recognized them as subspecies, T. (T.) cristulata cristulata and T. (T.) cristulata echinata , but no specimens of the latter taxon were available to Eschmeyer (1969). Since Eschmeyer (1969), all authors have followed this classification without comparing specimens of each taxon. A direct comparison of specimens from the western and eastern sectors of the Atlantic Ocean (including a range of sizes) is required to resolve the status of the species and subspecies.
Eschmeyer (1969) described T. eschmeyeri ZBK (as capensis ) on the basis of one specimen from the southeastern Atlantic (see account under ‘Geographic distribution of T. (M.) eschmeyeri ZBK ’). Characters for specimens of T. eschmeyeri ZBK examined here from the southern Indian Ocean and southwestern Pacific Ocean agree with Eschmeyer’s (1969) description of a southeastern Atlantic specimen. However, although all our preserved specimens were whitish, lacking distinct pigments (except for a black blotch on the dorsal fin in males), Eschmeyer’s specimen was tinged with black all over the body (see Eschmeyer, 1969: fig. 5C). Collections from the southeastern Atlantic Ocean are scant, so further sampling is needed to enable useful comparisons with specimens from the southern Indo-West Pacific.